Kostenanalyse für die CO2-Abscheidung an Punktquellen und direkt aus der Atmosphäre Kostenvergleich von ausgewählten Anwendungsfällen für CCU/S und DACCU/S

Summary

This German study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of various CO2 capture, utilization, and storage (CCU/CCS) methods, comparing direct air capture (DAC) with point-source capture. It concludes that point-source CO2 capture followed by ship transport for storage or utilization abroad is generally more cost-effective than DAC directly at the storage site. For methanol production, capture from thermal waste treatment plants with CO2 export is often cheaper than DAC. The study highlights that CO2 capture costs and hydrogen provision for CCU are the largest cost components, while transport costs play a minor role.

Key Facts

Source Document

https://example-government.gov/policy-document-link