13 high-volume countries · 15+ with core plans · See coverage →

Government climate & energy
policy, structured for research.

For policy researchers, sustainability consultants, climate journalists, and multilateral analysts working with primary government documents.

Not designed for project finance pricing data, commodities trading, or compliance certification. See who this is for.

Question

What renewable energy targets has Indonesia set, and what policies support them?

Answer

Indonesia aims to achieve Net Zero Emissions by 2060 or sooner [5][15], with an unconditional NDC target of 31.89% emission reduction by 2030 [15]. As of 2023, installed renewable energy capacity reached 13,155.54 MW [14], with geothermal potential estimated at 23.36 GW [7]...

Indonesia · UNFCCC · 2025Indonesia · ESDM · 2024Indonesia · NDC · 2022

Built for professionals who need to move fast

📄

Primary sources only

Answers drawn exclusively from official government publications, NDCs, and international agency reports — not news articles or secondary sources.

🌍

Honest coverage map

13 countries with high document volume, plus selected national plans for ~15 more. Volume varies by document type — we publish what we have, what dominates the mix, and known canonical gaps at /coverage.

🔗

Every answer is cited

Each claim links back to the source document with title, country, and date so you can verify and share with confidence.

🎯

Strategic layer only — by design

We index national plans, NDCs, and statutory frameworks. We do NOT cover auction prices, tariff caps, or implementing decrees governing commercial PPA terms. Use BNEF / Wood Mackenzie for those.

Who PolicyLens is for

We optimise hard for a specific kind of work. If your job is below, you're in the right place. If not, we'd rather you knew before paying.

Use PolicyLens if you are…

  • Policy researchers and academics tracking NDCs, national plans, and statutory frameworks
  • Sustainability and climate consultants advising on CSDDD, CBAM, or jurisdictional policy risk
  • Climate and energy journalists fact-checking policy claims with primary government sources
  • Multilateral and donor analysts comparing regulatory positions across countries (e.g. JETP monitoring)
  • Corporate ESG / sustainability leads needing primary policy citations for disclosure documents

PolicyLens is not the right tool for…

  • Project finance / investment due diligence

    We do not have auction clearing prices, tariff caps, or implementing decrees. Use BNEF, Wood Mackenzie, or S&P Global.

  • Energy or carbon trading

    We do not provide market prices, real-time data, or trading-grade information.

  • Project-level legal advice

    We index country-and-policy-level documents, not individual PPAs, ESIAs, or transaction documents. Engage a local counsel.

  • Compliance certification

    Our AI synthesises from primary documents but answers must be verified against the cited source before use in any compliance, investment, or legal decision.

Detailed scope at /coverage. We disclose what we cover and what we deliberately exclude.

vs. free policy databases

Several excellent free databases already exist. We do not compete with them on volume. We add what they do not — synthesis, attribution discipline, and structured key facts.

Strong free starting points we recommend you also use:

If your work is satisfied by browsing and full-text search across raw documents, those tools are free and excellent. Use them.

What PolicyLens adds for $299/year:

AI synthesis with verified citations

Ask a question, get a structured answer — headline figure, surrounding context, and inline [N] citations. Free databases let you find documents; PolicyLens synthesises across them.

Country attribution discipline

When you ask about Vietnam, our retriever and prompt will not pull India's CCTS or Brazil's SBCE into the answer as if it were Vietnamese policy. Generic LLM tools regularly do this.

Hallucination guardrails

If the database does not contain the answer, the chat says "no information found" cleanly in the headline — not a vague approximation. Our QA reviewers (FT correspondents, World Bank advisors) repeatedly noted this discipline.

Structured Key Facts per document

Numerical targets, deadlines, mechanism details extracted into a consistent schema. Saves the half-day of skimming each PDF.

Cross-document, cross-country comparison

Compare NDCs across three countries, or align a national plan against an NDC, in a single query. Free databases require you to open and read each document.

If you mostly need to read raw documents on a known country, the free options above are likely sufficient. PolicyLens is for the work where you ask questions — across documents, across countries, with verifiable citations — and need the answer fast and disciplined.

Simple pricing

Browse free. Pay once for full access — no subscription, no auto-renewal.

Free
$0

Browse the database

  • 4,300+ documents · 13 high-volume countries · 15+ with core plans
  • Full English summaries
  • Filter by country, year, language
  • No account required
Browse free
Most popular
Pro
$299/year

For policy researchers, sustainability consultants, and climate journalists

  • Structured Key Facts (numbers, deadlines, mechanisms)
  • Direct links to original government PDFs
  • AI chat — answered from official documents only, with citations
  • 1 access key, valid 1 year
Get Pro
Team
$699/year

For consultancies and multilateral analyst teams (3 seats)

  • Everything in Pro
  • 3 access keys issued
  • Share with your team
Get Team